Sunday, November 1, 2009

U.S. training bolsters Mexico's war on drugs

In 2006 Mexican President Felipe Calderon launched an anti-drug crackdown. Since July a total of 81 U.S law enforcement officials have been sent to Mexico to teach Mexican police cadets techniques in fighting the drug war. U.S. law enforcement officials are teaching Mexico's newly formed Federal Police skills such as interviewing witnesses, collecting evidence, and performing surveillance.

This program of teaching Mexico's police cadets is part of a $1.4 billion dollar U.S aid Package to Mexico. This program is also a new step for Mexico who has been known for not allowing U.S. agents on their soil. The program is working to train the cadets to be ready for U.S.-style oral trials, so that the Mexican government can change their legal system from the exchange of written documents to similar trials. "So far, 2,052 Federal Police have graduate from the training program, and an additional 1,051 are taking classes now, program administrator Rafael Lopez said."

I think this it is good that the U.S. is helping Mexico, and keeping good relations while doing so. I also think it is good that Mexico is willing to let U.S. agents on their soil. As for how this program will affect the U.S. I think it will have positive results in the long run. Right now, a lot of money is being invested into the program, while our nation is having its own financial crisis. If, however, this program limits drug production in Mexico, ultimately there will be less Mexican drugs flowing into the U.S.

It is nice to see countries working together to solve an international problem!

Hawley Chris. "U.S. training bolsters Mexico's war on drugs." USAToday.com. November 1 2009.
http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=826963805248250667&postID=2794600482145093636

1 comment:

  1. One need not travel to China to find indigenous cultures lacking human rights or to Cuba for political prisoners. America leads the world in percentile behind bars, thanks to ongoing persecution of hippies, radicals, and non-whites under prosecution of the war on drugs. If we’re all about spreading liberty abroad, then why mix the message at home? Peace on the home front would enhance global credibility.

    The drug czar’s Rx for prison fodder costs dearly, as life is flushed down expensive tubes. My shaman’s second opinion is that psychoactive plants are God’s gift. Behold, it’s all good. When Eve ate the apple, she knew a good apple, and an evil prohibition. Canadian Marc Emery is being extradited to prison for selling seeds that American farmers use to reduce U. S. demand for Mexican pot.

    Only on the authority of a clause about interstate commerce does the CSA (Controlled Substances Act of 1970) reincarnate Al Capone, endanger homeland security, and throw good money after bad. Administration fiscal policy burns tax dollars to root out the number-one cash crop in the land, instead of taxing sales. Society rejected the plague of prohibition, but it mutated. Apparently, SWAT teams don’t need no stinking amendment.

    Nixon passed the CSA on the false assurance that the Schafer Commission would later justify criminalizing his enemies. No amendments can assure due process under an anti-science law without due process itself. Psychology hailed the breakthrough potential of LSD, until the CSA shut down research, and pronounced that marijuana has no medical use, period. Drug juries exclude bleeding hearts.

    The RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993) allows Native American Church members to eat peyote, which functions like LSD. Americans shouldn’t need a specific church membership or an act of Congress to obtain their birthright freedom of religion. John Doe’s free exercise of religious liberty may include entheogen sacraments to mediate communion with his maker.

    Freedom of speech presupposes freedom of thought. The Constitution doesn’t enumerate any governmental power to embargo diverse states of mind. How and when did government usurp this power to coerce conformity? The Mayflower sailed to escape coerced conformity. Legislators who would limit cognitive liberty lack jurisdiction.

    Common-law must hold that adults are the legal owners of their own bodies. The Founding Fathers undersigned that the right to the pursuit of happiness is inalienable. Socrates said to know your self. Mortal lawmakers should not presume to thwart the intelligent design that molecular keys unlock spiritual doors. Persons who appreciate their own free choice of path in life should tolerate seekers’ self-exploration.

    ReplyDelete